Saturday, June 19, 2010

Is Mary mother of Jesus, the sister of Aaron and the daughter of Imran?

Quote Farza

I am sending some verses of The Qur'an that will show the high status of Jesus, peace be upon him in the Qur'an: The description starts with the conception of Mary, mother of Jesus, pbuh.



There is no proof that the passages in the Quran are divinely words of God as Satan can even quote from scripture to Eve and Messiah JESUS.  Satan can even quote "If you are the Son of God" for 2 times (Matthew 4:3 & 6) to Messiah JESUS but Quran does not have a single title on the Son of God but has replaced it with the "son of Mary"!

Let's analyze the Quran as where the error lies on Mary, sister of Aaron?

3:33 God did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,-
3:34 Offspring, one of the other: And God heareth and knoweth all things.
3:35 Behold! a woman of 'Imran said: "O my Lord! I do dedicate unto Thee what is in my womb for Thy special service: So accept this of me: For Thou hearest and knowest all things."
3:36 When she was delivered, she said: "O my Lord! Behold! I am delivered of a female child!"- and God knew best what she brought forth- "And no wise is the male Like the female. I have named her Mary ...

The question to be answered is that is it historically true that Mary was daughter of Imran?

The context of Surah 3:33-36 shows that Mary is the female child that came out of the womb of the wife of `Imran, then she is the direct daughter of `Imran and there is no question that the theory of "far descendency" is contradicted by the Qur'an itself.

In several Surahs the Qur'an confuses Mary the mother of Jesus [Miriam in Hebrew] with Miriam the sister of Aaron and Moses, and daughter of Amram who lived around 1,400 B.C.
At length she brought (the babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms), They said: "O Mary! Truly a strange thing has thou brought! "O sister of Aaron, thy father was not a man of evil, nor your mother a woman unchaste!"
-- Sura 19:27-28
And Mary, the daughter of `Imran, ...
-- Sura 66:12

Moses and Aaron are sons of Amran (Exodus 6:20), called "Musa ibn `Imran" and "Harun ibn `Imran" in the Hadiths, just the same way as Mary is called "Maryam ibnat `Imran" in Sura 66:12.

Exodus 6:20  And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife; and she bare him Aaron and Moses: and the years of the life of Amram were an hundred and thirty and seven years.

Only Aaron became a Priest of the Lord and in fact the first High Priest. And only Aaron's descendents became priests or prophets of God.
Exodus 7:1  And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet.

Neither Moses nor their sister Miriam are ever understood to be in "priestly lineage." Amram is definitely not a priest. If Mary's lineage of being part of a priestly family should be stressed, then necessarily she would have to be called a daughter of Aaron, since all of Israel's priests are descendants of Aaron, while his brother Moses and sister Miriam are not reckoned among the priestly line.

Muhammad understood that Jesus, son of Mary sister of Aaron, was created by God as that of Adam and he advised those who disagreed to invoke God to curse those who lie.
3:59 The similitude of Jesus before God is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be". And he was.
3:60 The Truth (comes) from God alone; so be not of those who doubt.
3:61 If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of God on those who lie!"

As the words of Muhammad contradicted with the words of Lord JESUS CHRIST, the Son of God, the curse will fall on the originator of the lie and those who lied against JESUS the Son of God. Lord JESUS CHRIST  said explicitly "I came down from Heaven" and "I came out from GOD".

John 6:38  For I came down from Heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

John 16:27-28  For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God; I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father.

Lord JESUS CHRIST made it very clear that no man lives in Heaven and that "I am from above and ye are of this world; I am not of this world".
John 8:23  And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.

John 1:18  No man hath ever seen God; the only begotten God, he who is in the bosom of his Father, he hath declared [him].

John 3:13  (Jesus said) And no man hath ascended up to Heaven, but he that came down from Heaven, even the Son of Man which is in heaven.

Muhammad had mistaken Mary or Miriam and Aaron are sister and brother of Moses who lived at least 1400 years apart from Mary, mother of Jesus.  Mary has a cousin by the name of Elizabeth who is the daughters of Aaron (Luke 1:5 & 36).

Luke 1:5  There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.

In kinship terminology, a cousin is a relative with whom one shares a common ancestor. Hence the term "cousin" means Mary and Elizabeth are from the same forefathers.  As Elizabeth is from the descent of Aaron the priesthood bloodline, Mary shall also be called the daughters of Aaron.

There is no escape that Quran is wrong in respect of the descent of Mary, the mother of Jesus. She is Not the sister of Aaron nor the daughter of Amran but the daughters of Aaron the priest. Because in the Jewish culture, the kinship is usually taken from the most influential forefathers and not the less influential one. Amran is not the priest of God as his son Aaron is the first Priest consecrated by Moses.

Exo 28:41  And thou shalt put them upon Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him; and shalt anoint them, and consecrate them, and sanctify them, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office.

Historically, Mary the sister of Moses and Aaron is NOT the mother of JESUS CHRIST, the Son of GOD. Because Muhammad had identified the wrong mother who did Not bear JESUS CHRIST, the Son of God into the world, Quran is talking about another JESUS who is merely from the fables of Muhammad. Only the historical JESUS CHRIST is the true Messiah as told in the Gospel of the Holy Bible.

Quran is void of the truth!

Even though the Quran has 22 times of the title "Son of Mary" and 25 times of the Name Jesus, it DOES NOT glorify LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD because there is not a single time He is mentioned as the Son of God. This has nothing to do with culture of the Arabs but the works of the Satan. The title "Son of Mary" is not used by God the Father Himself who called Him "My Beloved Son" Matt 3:17.

The Jews were offending JESUS with the title son of Mary. Why Quran continues to insult Him???

Mark 6:3  Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

Do you call the Quran exalts JESUS or insulting Him continuously???

The Word of JESUS is the truth and not any man's word. Muslim like TDNC has quoted John 8:32 out of context.

John 8:31  Then Jesus said to the Jews who believed on Him, "If you continue in My Word, you are My disciples indeed.
John 8:32  And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."

God will pity you if you do not repent of your sins and will suffer for eternity in Hell. I have proved to you that you believed in the fables of men and not in the historical facts about Mary and Jesus, the Son of God.

You have lied to JESUS and to GOD the Almighty when you share the false doctrines of men and consider it as from GOD. Liars will enter Hell fire for eternity.

Rev 21:7  He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
Rev 21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.


Anders Branderud said...

"Historical J....."!?!

The persons using that contra-historical oxymoron (demonstrated by the eminent late Oxford historian, James Parkes, The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue) exposes dependancy upon 4th-century, gentile, Hellenist sources.

While scholars debate the provenance of the original accounts upon which the earliest extant (4th century, even fragments are post-135 C.E.), Roman gentile, Hellenist-redacted versions were based, there is not one fragment, not even one letter of the NT that derives DIRECTLY from the 1st-century Pharisee Jews who followed the Pharisee Ribi Yehoshua.
Historians like Parkes, et al., have demonstrated incontestably that 4th-century Roman Christianity was the 180° polar antithesis of 1st-century Judaism of ALL Pharisee Ribis. The earliest (post-135 C.E.) true Christians were viciously antinomian (ANTI-Torah), claiming to supersede and displace Torah, Judaism and ("spiritual) Israel and Jews. In soberest terms, ORIGINAL Christianity was anti-Torah from the start while DSS (viz., 4Q MMT) and ALL other Judaic documentation PROVE that ALL 1st-century Pharisees were PRO-Torah.

There is a mountain of historical Judaic information Christians have refused to deal with, at: (see, especially, their History Museum pages beginning with "30-99 C.E.").
Original Christianity = ANTI-Torah. Ribi Yehoshua and his Netzarim, like all other Pharisees, were PRO-Torah. Intractable contradiction.

Building a Roman image from Hellenist hearsay accounts, decades after the death of the 1st-century Pharisee Ribi, and after a forcible ouster, by Hellenist Roman gentiles, of his original Jewish followers (135 C.E., documented by Eusebius), based on writings of a Hellenist Jew excised as an apostate by the original Jewish followers (documented by Eusebius) is circular reasoning through gentile-Roman Hellenist lenses.

What the historical Pharisee Ribi taught is found not in the hearsay accounts of post-135 C.E. Hellenist Romans but, rather, in the Judaic descriptions of Pharisees and Pharisee Ribis of the period... in Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT (see Prof. Elisha Qimron), inter alia.

To all Christians: The question is, now that you've been informed, will you follow the authentic historical Pharisee Ribi? Or continue following the post-135 C.E. Roman-redacted antithesis—an idol?

Anonymous said...

Quality is better than quantity.....................................................................

Anonymous said...

great msg for me, thanks a lot dude˙﹏˙..................................................................

Anonymous said...

No one knows the weight of anothers burden. ............................................................

Anonymous said...

Learning makes a good man better and ill man worse.............................................................